June 20, 2013

Retrospective Smackdown: Jean Paul Gaultier vs. Cindy Sherman

For the moment, San Francisco has not one, but two must-see fashion-centric exhibitions on display. Jean Paul Gaultier’s edgy ensembles have taken over the deYoung Museum with The Fashion World of Jean Paul Gaultier: From the Sidewalk to the Catwalk, while Cindy Sherman’s variety of costume changes are gracing the galleries of SFMOMA in Cindy Sherman. We compare the exhibits blow-by-blow. Who will win this stylish smackdown? Read on to find out.

1. Volume: 

Over 140 ensembles of Gaultier’s are currently showcased, along with sketches, documents, photographs and even his first teddy bear. There are 150+ photographs of Sherman by Sherman on display in SFMOMA. But judging not by individual pieces, but based on the sheer size of the exhibitions, GAULTIER has Round 1 in the bag.

Gaultier’s “Galleon” headband. Photographed by Jennymay Villarete

Cindy Sherman, Untitled #92, 1981; chromogenic color print; 24 x 47 15/16″ (61 x 121.9 cm); The Museum of Modern Art, New York, The Fellows of Photography Fund; © 2012 Cindy Sherman

2. Technology:

Gaultier worked closely with Montreal-based theatee company Ubu Compagnie de Création to produce lively projections of faces to bring mannequins to life (see photos). Also, the lighting of the exhibition transforms the galleries into more of a spectacle. However, Sherman relies on Photoshop alongside clothing, prosthetics and make-up to completely manipulate her image in every photograph. For using technology as part of the art, Round 2 goes to SHERMAN.

Cindy Sherman, Untitled #193, 1989; chromogenic color print; 48 7/8 x 41 15/16″ (124.1 x 106.5 cm); courtesy the artist and Metro Pictures, New York; © 2012 Cindy Sherman

Gaultier mannequin photographed by Jennymay Villarete

3. Tangibility:

Keep your hands in your pockets, ladies and gentlemen. Gaultier’s variety of textures and fabrics makes it hard to abide those “DO NOT TOUCH” signs. Even though Sherman’s photographs make you want to jump in and be a part of her creative process, they don’t have the same 3-D effect as the physical clothes themselves. Round 3’s winner is GAULTIER.

Gaultier ensemble photographed by Jennymay Villarete

Cindy Sherman, Untitled #512, 2011; chromogenic color print; 6′ 7 3/4″ x 11′ 4 7/8″ (202.6 x 347.6 cm); The Museum of Modern Art, New York, courtesy the artist and Metro Pictures, New York; © 2012 Cindy Sherman

4. Exclusivity:

Both artists are celebrating their retrospective debuts with these traveling exhibitions. Plus, they both boast the appeal of showing “never before seen” items. Yet, Gaultier’s designs have graced many magazine pages, thanks to his runway shows, red carpets and celebrity collaborations (who doesn’t know Madonna and her cone bra?). Sherman’s acclaimed Untitled Film Stills series, owned by MoMA in New York City, has never been shown with all 69 photographs all together in one exhibition. Since it’s the first time you can see the entire series. And with that, SHERMAN wins Round 4.

Cindy Sherman, Untitled Film Still #56, 1980; gelatin silver print; 6 3/8 x 9 7/16″ (16.2 x 24 cm); The Museum of Modern Art, New York, acquired through the generosity of Jo Carole and Ronald S. Lauder in memory of Mrs. John D. Rockefeller 3rd; © 2012 Cindy Sherman

Gaultier’s first cone bra on his childhood teddy bear. Photographed by Jennymay Villarete

5. Social Commentary:

Both artists explore controversial and provocative topics relating to sexuality, diversity, and multiculturalism. Using clothing and styling, Gaultier and Sherman encourage viewers to consider various issues in the world on a broader spectrum. Looks like this one’s a TIE.

Gaultier bodysuit photographed by Jennymay Villarete.

Cindy Sherman, Untitled #458, 2007-08; chromogenic color print; 6′ 5 3/8″ x 58 1/4″ (196.5 x 148 cm); courtesy the artist and Metro Pictures, New York; © 2012 Cindy Sherman

DING DING DING! This smackdown crowns both Jean Paul Gaultier and Cindy Sherman as victors of this match. Did you really expect us to choose one of these intriguing artists over the other? As if. They both use fashion to articulate big ideas about our world and do so in aesthetically beautiful and interesting ways.  Not only did this result in a tie, but there’s a literal tie between the two: there’s a Cindy Sherman piece IN the Gaultier exhibition (see image below).

If you’re pressed for time, be sure to check out Gaultier’s work at the deYoung because it closes on August 19. Luckily, you still have a few months to get some face time with Cindy Sherman at SFMOMA, which closes on October 8.

Cindy Sherman, Untitled #131, 1983; chromogenic color print; 7′ 10 3/4″ x 45 1/4″ (240.7 x 114.9 cm); courtesy the artist and Metro Pictures, New York; © 2012 Cindy Sherman

More San Francisco fashion...

Photography of “The Fashion World of Jean Paul Gaultier” by Jennymay Villarete.

Photography of “Cindy Sherman” courtesy of SFMOMA.

Inside the Fashion World of Jean Paul Gaultier

The last word you’d think to associate with designer Jean Paul Gaultier is “mainstream.” Yet on the first floor of San Francisco’s De Young museum during Gaulterize Yourself, as six-year-olds and their mothers walked by decked out in feathers and wild makeup, it was easy to forget that the celebration was all in homage to the same man who brought us Madonna’s cone bras and a body suit with sequined pubic hair.  This free public event put on by the San Francisco Fashion and Merchants Alliance as part of Friday Nights at the De Young, featured not only the newly-opened exhibition The Fashion World of Jean Paul Gaultier: From the Sidewalk to the Catwalk but also makeup artists and local designers transforming ordinary citizens into Gaultier model lookalikes.

Descending into the lower level, the true Gaultier aesthetic quickly revealed itself. It made sense, after all, to stick this exhibit in the basement: where else do you put S&M burlesque dancers, punk rock outcasts and a semi-topless warrior bride? And though seeing so many of the designer’s famous (and less famous) creations in one exhibit would have been thrilling enough on its own, this would not be a Gaultier event if there was not a new and unexpected twist.

Only Jean Paul Gaultier could take something as basic to fashion as a mannequin and turn it into something fresh and intriguing, if not also slightly creepy and unsettling.  Or as one woman described it, plain “scary.” But by projecting moving faces onto the blank, nosed masks of mannequins, Gaultier did just that. Wearing his creations were models that, while not technically alive, came a little too close for comfort to the real thing. And like the gut reactions we feel to many of his designs (picture a metal codpiece for men or a garbage dress for women à la Mugatu) the exhibit’s models straddle the line between feminine and masculine, traditional and modern, beautiful and grotesque. The digital display didn’t stop there: visitors will also find a moving runway and forty video screens. But it is the speaking, watching, emoting mannequins that are the exhibit’s most provocative technological element, and therefore its most quintessentially Gaultier.

And of course, there are the clothes. Each piece is a testament to the unparalleled creativity of a man challenging every fashion definition we know, forcing us to contemplate them, not allowing us to just move past them mindlessly like we do with so much we see in museums. Coupled with one of his most exquisitely feminine creations – a purple velvet dress adorned with his trademark cones – is the seductive 1992 photograph of the piece being worn by male model and Gaultier muse, Tanel Bedrossiantz. Whether in military-inspired camouflage, head-to-toe herringbone, or his oft-imitated sailor stripes motif, Gaultier isn’t just playing with gender norms, he is thrusting them into the public conversation, transforming the personal and private into the political and powerful.

Gaultier gives us revolution through fashion. He transformed the corset from a form of female oppression into a symbol of sexual prowess and dominance. He made a long skirt, put it on a man, and called it sexy. He showed us that the line between what is sublime and what is horrifying is largely subjective, and in this exhibit, dares us to join him in this warped reality, one that, despite being “scary,” is also unnervingly inviting.

More San Francisco fashion

Photography by Deena Shanker

Deena Shanker is a San Francisco writer who blogs and blogs and, uh, blogs. In fact, she has three blogs. You’ll find them and more about her online at www.deenashanker.com.